Casey Reagan Herridge
Sep 20, 2018

Did you Know... Calls should be made promptly

1 comment

From Friend at Court:

17. Prompt calls eliminate two chance option. A player shall make all calls promptly. A call shall be made either before the player’s return shot has gone out of play or before an opponent has had an opportunity to play the return shot. Prompt calls will quickly eliminate the “two chances to win the point” option that some players practice. To illustrate, a player is advancing to the net for an easy put away and sees a ball from an adjoining court rolling toward the court. The player continues to advance and hits the shot, only to have the supposed easy put away fly over the baseline. The player then claims a let. The claim is not valid because the player forfeited the right to call a let by choosing instead to play the ball. The player took a chance to win or lose and is not entitled to a second chance.

bodepa
Sep 29

A smart blog is devoid of the controlled items for the future items. The nature of the control and premier essay reviews is hidden for the reforms for the sanity of the offs for the parts in the field for the goodness or the citizens.

New Posts
  • Casey Reagan Herridge
    Nov 27, 2018

    From Friend at Court: 30. Delays during service. When the server’s second service motion is interrupted by a ball coming onto the court, the server is entitled to two serves. When there is a delay between the first and second serves: • The server gets one serve if the server was the cause of the delay; • The server gets two serves if the delay was caused by the receiver or if there was outside interference. The time it takes to clear a ball that comes onto the court between the first and second serves is not considered sufficient time to warrant the server receiving two serves unless this time is so prolonged as to constitute an interruption. The receiver is the judge of whether the delay is sufficiently prolonged to justify giving the server two serves.
  • Casey Reagan Herridge
    Oct 28

    According to the Texas Section Operating Procedures: 2.06A(2): Split-Up - No more than three (3) players who were on the roster of any team that advanced to, or qualified for, any National Championship team the previous year may play together in the same Division, same Age Group and at the same NTRP team level as the National Championship team(s), if their NTRP rating allows. Split-Up requirements only apply to players who participated in three (3) or more matches (including one default) for that team during the championship year.
  • Casey Reagan Herridge
    Aug 18, 2018

    From The Code in Friend at Court: 32. Disputes. Disputes over the score shall be resolved by using one of the following methods, which are listed in the order of preference: • Count all points and games agreed upon by the players and replay only disputed points or games; • If the players do not agree on the court in which the disputed point started, toss a coin to select the court. • If the players do not agree on who served a disputed point in a tiebreak, toss a coin to select the server. (A coin toss may also be needed to determine the side in which the point is played and the end from which the server serves.) • If the players do not agree on who served a disputed game, toss a coin to select the server. • Play from a score mutually agreeable to all players; • Spin a racket or toss a coin.

©2017 The San Antonio Tennis Association, Inc. (SATA)  All rights reserved.

SATA, Inc.  |  1503 San Pedro Ave. |  San Antonio, TX 78212

 

Phone  210.735.3069   

  • Facebook - Grey Circle
  • Instagram - Grey Circle
  • YouTube - Grey Circle
  • Twitter - Grey Circle